PI
Version: 6 (current) | Updated: 12/15/2025, 11:29:20 PM | Created: 12/15/2025, 11:17:44 PM
Added description
* Ethical dissent: The writer expresses an inability to continue participating in “gradations or incapacitants” and objects to what is perceived as ongoing misconduct by the faculty. * Resignation and protest: The author declares a decision not to sign an “invalid diploma,” indicating a refusal to endorse a credential deemed compromised. * Calls for reform: The letter urges the reconstruction of regulations or alternative mechanisms to prevent recurrence of the cited wrongs, suggesting that mere resolutions or pledges are insufficient. * Personal resolve: The writer states a firm intention to withdraw from St. College unless satisfactory corrective measures are implemented.
The image captures the original handwriting, while the OCR text provides searchable content for researchers.
rescuse in changing my course of view or conduct. I cannot permit myself to be a party any more to the gradations or incapacitants. If any means can be devised to secure herself from such results as have been reached this session, I shall only be too happy & labor on in St. College & for the Cause as heretofore—but a mere resolve & pledge will not assure me: thus we have had before—several probably did so & might have a stronger desire to go right than previous to the voting this Spring. I yet—in my view & in yours too, now, if I mistake not—the faculty immutably proceed to do wrong—what will prevent such things from recurring? Not resolutions—not pledges. One may as many others have done—"resolve & unresolve—time is the same"—If a reconstruction of regulations or any other mode of effecting the object can be devised I shall be glad, if not—I cannot be induced to remain for I have full made up my mind never to sign an invalid diploma.