Unnamed faculty member of St. College who authored the letter, expressing refusal to sign an invalid diploma, questioning faculty ethics, and proposing regulatory reform.
Relationships
addresses
description: Criticizes the faculty's ethical conduct and questions their immutable tendency to do wrong.
refuses to sign
description: Declares an unwillingness to endorse an invalid diploma, stating a firm decision not to sign it.
proposes
description: Suggests devising a reconstruction of regulations or other mechanisms to prevent future ethical breaches.
continues work for
description: Affirms commitment to labor for the Cause within St. College despite the ethical conflict.
references
description: Mentions the recent spring voting as context for perceived faculty misconduct.
description: Cites the ongoing academic session as the timeframe for potential resignation if issues remain unresolved.
writes
commits to
intends resignation from
critiques
reason: insufficient to prevent recurring unethical actions
seeks
purpose: to devise a mode of effecting ethical compliance
Version History (3 versions)
✓ v3 (current) · 12/16/2025, 4:16:09 AM "Added 5 relationship(s)"
v2 · 12/16/2025, 4:12:45 AM · View this version "Added 6 relationship(s)"